This submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee inquiry into right wing extremist movements in Australia reflects the opinions of the four authors. It was originally submitted to the Committee in April 2024. The authors gave further evidence to the Parliamentary Committee on 24th July 2024.

The Submission makes 5 recommendations to the Committee:

1. Terminology: Government and policymakers should shift from "right-wing extremism" to more specific terms such as “ideologically motivated violent extremism” (IMVE), "issue-based grievances" or group specific language (e.g. ‘neo-Nazi’, ‘violent misogynists’) to better reflect the difference in radicalisation motivations and avoid politicisation.
2. Clarification: Government and policymakers should emphasise the distinction between extremism, violent extremism and terrorism, highlighting that only violent extremism and terrorism are criminal or national security issues.
3. Freedom of Expression: Government and policymakers should recognise that freedom of speech and respectful engagement are vital for national resilience, and avoid criminalising extremist views that don’t involve violence.
4. Zero-Tolerance for Criminality: Government and policymakers should maintain a zero-tolerance policy for criminal actions related to extremism, including hate speech and violence.
5. Non-Law Enforcement Policies: Government and policymakers should increase funding for community programs promoting civic engagement and social cohesion through initiatives like the Community Engagement Resilience Grant.

The submission also discusses relevant topics to the inquiry such as: the nature and extent of movements and persons holding extremist right-wing views in Australia; young people and radicalisation; measures to counter violent extremism in Australia focusing on young people; and maintaining an apolitical approach.

The submission concludes that Australia’s approach to right wing extremism should create a balance between security and freedom, and promote respectful debate while simultaneously addressing harmful extremism. Policies should be comprehensive and adapt to the ongoing situation, prioritising the protection of democratic values and maintaining social cohesion.